विजयी होना वाक्य

उदाहरण वाक्य

1. (3) Wanting to appear the underdog or to be taking heavier casualties inverts the historic imperative, as I put it in 2006, “whereby each side wants to intimidate the enemy by appearing ferocious, relentless, and victorious.”
   (3) भुक्तभोगी दिखना और अधिक मृतक संख्या ऐतिहासिक धारा को उलटता है जहाँ कि, “ प्रत्येक पक्ष शत्रु को भयभीत करना चाहता है और किसी भी प्रकार विजयी होना चाहता है”
2. Overall, how goes the war? The first half-year showed some U.S. gains, but the real groundwork must still be laid if America is to win. Much toil lies ahead, starting with the ideological battle and with the diplomatic campaign not far behind. Related Topics: Terrorism , US policy , War on terror receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Reader comments (2) on this item Comment on this item
   ग्रेड डी कुल मिलाकर युद्ध कैसा जा रहा है? पहली छमाही से प्रतीत होता है कि अमेरिका को लाभ मिल रहा है परंतु यदि अमेरिका को विजयी होना है तो काफी जमीनी कार्य शेष है। अभी विचारधारागत संघर्ष से कूटनीतिक अभियान तक काफी कुछ करना बाकी है।
3. Of course, Israel faces obstacles in achieving victory. The country is hemmed in generally by international expectations (from the United Nations Security Council, for example) and specifically by the policies of its main ally, the U.S. government. Therefore, if Jerusalem is to win, that starts with a change in policy in the United States and in other Western countries. Those governments should urge Israel to seek victory by convincing the Palestinians that they have lost.
   निश्चित रूप से इजरायल को विजय प्राप्त करने में अनेक बाधाओं का सामना करना पडेगा। देश अनेक अंतरराष्ट्रीय अपेक्षाओं ( संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ सुरक्षा परिषद ) और अपने प्रमुख सहयोगी अमेरिका की नीतियों से घिरा है । लेकिन फिर भी यदि जेरूसलम को विजयी होना है तो इसके लिये अमेरिका तथा अन्य पश्चिमी देशों की नीतियों में कुछ परिवर्तन होना होगा। इन सरकारों को इजरायल के आग्रह करना चाहिये कि वे फिलीस्तीनियों को यह समझाकर विजय प्राप्त करें कि फिलीस्तीनी पराजित हो चुके हैं।
4. Here is my logic for this reluctant suggestion: Evil forces pose less danger to us when they make war on each other. This (1) keeps them focused locally and it (2) prevents either one from emerging victorious (and thereby posing a yet-greater danger). Western powers should guide enemies to stalemate by helping whichever side is losing, so as to prolong their conflict. This policy has precedent. Through most of World War II, Nazi Germany was on the offensive against Soviet Russia and keeping German troops tied down on the Eastern Front was critical to an Allied victory. Franklin D. Roosevelt therefore helped Joseph Stalin by provisioning his forces and coordinating the war effort with him. In retrospect, this morally repugnant but strategically necessary policy succeeded. And Stalin was a far worse monster than Assad. Stalin, Saddam Hussein ... and Bashar al-Assad?
   विश्लेषक इस बात से सहमत होंगे “ सीरिया के शासन की क्षमतायें बडी तेजी से कम हो रही हैं” ,कदम दर कदम यह पीछे हट रहा है और विद्रोहियों को सफलता मिलना और इस्लामवादियों का विजयी होना लगभग तय है। इसके उत्तर में मैं तटस्थ रहने की अपनी नीति को बदल रहा हूँ और एक मानवतावादी और दशकों तक असद शासन का शत्रु होने के चलते इस पर लिखने से पूर्व कुछ साँस लेना चाहता हूँ ।
5. Like so many other conservatives, I had come to assume that the Tea Party, the 2010 election results, Solyndra, 8 percent unemployment, Benghazi, and an aroused opposition (said one Romney adviser : on election day, “you just don't want to get in the way of a Republican heading into the polls”) assured defeat for Barack Obama's bid for a second term. His victory was therefore particularly bitter. Was I alone in sleeping badly and avoiding the news for days? So many analyses have been proffered for what went wrong: Romney was too conservative or not conservative enough, he ran on his biography, he shied away from winning issues, he could not connect with the masses . So many conclusions have also been drawn: conservatives need to modernize (hello, gay partnerships), they must reach out to non-whites (welcome, illegal immigrants), they should nominate true conservatives. Myself, I subscribe to the “politics is downstream from culture” argument. While conservatives sometimes prevail in policy debates, they consistently lose in the classroom, on the best-seller list, on television, at the movies, and in the world of arts. These liberal bastions, which provide the feeders for Democratic party politics, did not develop spontaneously but result from decades of hard work traceable back to the ideas of Antonio Gramsci.
   अनेक अन्य परम्परावादियों की ही भाँति मेरा भी अनुमान था कि टी पार्टी, 2010 के चुनाव परिणाम , सोलिंड्रा , 8 प्रतिशत बेरोजगारी , बेनगाजी तथा एक उठते हुये विपक्षी वातावरण के चलते ( चुनाव के दिन रोमनी के एक सलाहकार ने कहा था, ” आप रिपबलिकन विजय का हिस्सा नहीं बनना चाहते ) कि बराक ओबामा का दूसरी बात विजयी होना सम्भव नहीं है। इस कारण उनकी विजय विशेष रूप से कड्वी रही। क्या मैं अकेला था जो कि ठीक से सो नहीं पाया और दिन के समाचारों की उपेक्षा करता रहा?